Geomarkers versus biomarkers: paleoenvironmental and astrobiological significance.
نویسندگان
چکیده
A fundamental problem related to the paleoenvironmental study of early Earth rocks and minerals, and astrobiological exploration of planetary materials (e.g., asteroidal and Mars meteorites, Martian rocks) is not only recognizing and quantifying carbon-related compounds that may be present but also differentiating those molecules formed abiotically from those generated by extinct or extant life. Only through the combination of biomarkers and geomarkers will we be able to understand the global framework. Whereas, biological markers or ‘‘biomarkers’’ are molecular fossils (1), there is not a clear and official definition of the term ‘‘geomarker,’’ and it has been ambiguously used to refer to different topics, not always following a formal concept. Biomarkers are defined as ‘‘complex organic compounds, which originated from formerly living organisms and which are composed of carbon, hydrogen, and other elements. Abiotic organic compounds are not biomarkers per se because they do not originate from biosynthesis’’ (1). Biomarkers occur in many different types of materials and geological settings (sediments, rocks, crude oils, etc.) (2–10) and normally display negligible or no structural changes from their parent organic molecules in living organisms. Three principal characteristics permit biomarkers to be distinguished from many other organic compounds (11): ‘‘a) biomarkers have structures composed of repeating subunits, indicating that their precursors were components in living organisms; b) each parent biomarker is common in certain organisms; and c) these organisms can be abundant and widespread.’’ But, our planet and its biosphere evolved together, and the geobiological history of ecosystems is recorded in sedimentary rocks through billions of years (10). Geobiology attempts to rebuild the coevolution of life and environment throughout Earth’s history. Thus, to identify potential biomarkers regarding the type of microbes that lived (or still live) at the surface of Mars or other planets, we will need to use the rocks and minerals (and other geological features) as geomarkers to understand the geological and environmental contexts (12). In accordance with Farmer (13), in defining a site-selection strategy to explore for a Martian fossil record, a key concept is contemporaneous chemical precipitation or mineralization. On Earth, geological environments where microorganisms are often preserved in this way include, among others: i) mineralizing systems (subaerial, subaqueous, and shallow subsurface hydrothermal systems (Fig. 1); and cold springs of alkaline lakes); ii) saline/alkaline environments of arid marine shorelines (sabkhas), or terminal (evaporative) lake basins; iii) duricrusts and subsoil hardpan environments formed by the selective leaching and reprecipitation of minerals within soil profiles; and iv) periglacial environments ground ice or permafrost (frozen soils) captured and cryopreserved microorganisms and associated organic materials. A significant handicap in establishing the bio-geo link is the differential development and, in many cases, conceptual and epistemological gaps between the studies regarding biomarkers and geomarkers. But, although biomarkers are perfectly defined, what are geomarkers? A references search in the principal scientific database (ISI—Web of Science) shows nearly 14 000 references, including the term biomarker(s), but there are only 5 publications in which the term geomarker(s) occur(s) explicitly. There is not a clear and official definition of the term, and it has been ambiguously used to refer to different topics, not always following a formal concept. The specific works in which the term geomarker are particularly quoted deal with: i) the use of benzohopanes as geomarkers of sediments and petroleums (14); ii) the characterization of oil shales, using the alkane geomarkers as indicators of the immature character of sediments and the nature and environmental features of the source (15); iii) the utilization of spectroscopic techniques (Raman spectroscopy) for planetary exploration in the near future to search for extinct or extant life signals (16); iv) the use of some minerals (graphite) to carry out paleogeographic reconstractions (17, 18); and v) the use of mineralogical textures, crystal-chemical features and isotopic values as geomarkers in methanogenic and hydrothermal chimneys (19, 20). When regarding the specific relationship with life, it is important to note that the term ‘‘geosignature’’ has been proposed (21, 22). This review must be taken with caution, because the nonuse of the term geomarker does not necessarily mean that the geological aspects and indicators regarding the history and evolution of a specific geological environment have not been tackled, but it shows a spasmodic development that we want to stress in the present paper. A definition of the term geomarker is necessary, and we propose that geomarkers can be defined as any geological (i.e., mineralogical, geochemical, metallogenetic, sedimentological, petrological, tectonic) feature or set of features, which can be used as proxy indicators of the physical, chemical, and/ or biological characteristics of the environment in which they occur, and/or of the process that formed them. As demonstrated by the NASA–Mars ExplorationRover and ESA–Mars Express missions, geology, and, in particular, mineralogy, provides one the most robust means for discovering ancient aqueous environments and comprises an essential step in selecting the sites that have the best chance for having captured and preserved a record of ancient life or prebiotic chemistry. A sophisticated spectrometer can accurately identify a specific water-related mineral (e.g., jarosite, gypsum, kieserite) on Mars; but, what does it mean? We know that the same mineral can be formed in different terrestrial environments; the same sulfate that we can find in a dessert can also be the product of a hydrothermal system (12, 23). Thus, as previously defined, a previous step to detect possibleMartian biomarkers is the utilization of minerals as geomarkers to understand the global (geological and environmental) context (24). This implies that, if it is essential to determine what minerals and rocks are significant for the search of life on Mars, then the appropriate selection and detailed study of the
منابع مشابه
Clinical Significance of Salivary Biomarkers in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Review
Background and Aim: Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) accounts for approximately 3% of all cancers worldwide, and if diagnosed early, it has a five-year survival rate of around 85%; however, a late diagnosis may decrease the survival rate to 50%. Aberrant expression of several genes is associated with the hallmarks of OSCC including uncontrolled cell proliferation, poor differentiation, invas...
متن کاملTesting multivariate analysis in paleoenvironmental reconstructions using pollen records from Lagoa Salgada, NE Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil.
Despite the indisputable significance of identification of modern analogs for Paleoecology research, relatively few studies attempted to integrate modern and fossil samples on paleoenvironmental reconstructions. In Palynology, this general pattern is not different from other fields of Paleoecology. This study demonstrates the practical application of modern pollen deposition data on paleoenviro...
متن کاملTrace Fossils from the Campanian - Maastrichtian Enugu Formation of the Anambra Basin, South-eastern Nigeria: Implications for Paleoenvironmental Interpretation
The Enugu Formation is a member of the Nkporo Group, and forms part of the basal stratigraphic unit of the Anambra Basin in south-eastern Nigeria. The Enugu Formation has been the subject of many studies concerning stratigraphy [1], depositional environments [2; Onuigbo et al. [3], organic geochemistry [4-6], paleoecology [7], palynology [7-9] and ichnology [10]. Nwajide & Reijers [2] were the ...
متن کاملThe Open University ’ s repository of research publications and other research outputs Astrobiological instrumentation for Mars – the only
In this paper, in this edition of the Journal commemorating the life and work of David Wynn-Williams, we consider approaches to the astrobiological investigation of Mars. We provide a brief account of the scientific rationale behind the approach presented here. In particular, we outline the capabilities of the Raman spectrometer for the detection of biomarkers. David Wynn-Williams was an active...
متن کاملThe Open University ’ s repository of research publications and other research outputs Astrobiological instrumentation for Mars – the only way is down
In this paper, in this edition of the Journal commemorating the life and work of David Wynn-Williams, we consider approaches to the astrobiological investigation of Mars. We provide a brief account of the scientific rationale behind the approach presented here. In particular, we outline the capabilities of the Raman spectrometer for the detection of biomarkers. David Wynn-Williams was an active...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Ambio
دوره 36 5 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007